Material Examiner: Malone (RO) ;
Remarks:
Trial was conducted but no transcript was provided.
b6 b7C
- jens thar) | eon
CRM - 13074
INDEPENDENT CASE REVIEW REPORT
Independent Review conducted by: Steve Robertson
Area(s) of Expertise: Hair and Fiber Review commenced at: 12:30PM (Time), 03/14/2001 (Date) File #: 95-248596
Laboratory Hs): 20322112
Examiner(s) & Symbois Reviewed Not Reviewed Reviewed Not Reviewed xo o : a : Oo Qa oO go Oo
a Qo Oo o
Materials Reviewed Trial testimony transcript(s) of:
Testimony Date(s): Laboratory Report(s):
Laboratory Number: 20322112 Date: June 11, 19982 Laboratory Number: : Date:
Laboratory Number: Date:
Examiner Bench Notes of: RQ Laboratory Number: 20322112
Page 1 of 3
RM - 13075
CRM - 15075
ok ‘Wags any other material reviewed? XO Yes oO No
Results of Review
File #: 95-248596 Item or Specimen # Reviewed: Q1, Q2, K1-K3
Review of Laboratory Report(s) and Bench Notes:
Note: Numbered comments are required below or on additional pages for any “No” or “Unable to Determine” Responses
Did the examiner perform the appropriate tests in a scientifically acceptable manner, based on the methods, protocols, and analytic techniques available at the time of the original examination(s)? XO Yes QNo 1B Unable to Determine
Are the examination results set forth in the laboratory report(s) supported and adequately documented in the bench notes? CO Yes XCQNo_ OC Unable to Determine
Review of Testimony:
Note: Numbered comments are required below or on additional pages for any “No” or “Unable to Determine” Responses
XO Transcript not available. 3) Testimony consistent with the laboratory report(s)? OYes ONo OUnableto Determine . 4) Testimony consistent with the bench notes? QO Yes ONo OC Unable to Determine
5) Testimony within bounds of examiner's expertise? OYes ONo J Unable to Determine
Page 2 of 3
Initials: SW ct
Comments (Set forth by above question #, if applicable. Use “Additional Comments” Sheet, if needed)
"File #: 95-248596
#2: The examination results set forth in the laboratory report are supported by the bench notes, but the _
The conclusion that the green fibers recovered from the vehicle microscopically match the fibers from the
victim’s jacket is not documented in the notes.
The technician apparently performed solubility testing on the Q2 and K2 fibers.
Review completed at: 1:00 PM (Time), 03/14/2001 : (Date)
Total time spent conducting review (to nearest 1/4 hour): 0:30 hours
J hereby certify that I conducted this review in an independent, unbiased manner and that the results of my review are fully documented on this report consisting of a total of. 3 pages.
03/14/2001 (Signature) (Date)